`2020-10-21 16:15:00``2020-10-21 17:15:00``Nuclear Physics Seminar - Pavel Kovtun (University of Victoria) - Relativistic Navier-Stokes Equations``It has been widely believed that the relativistic Navier-Stokes equations violate the basic physical requirements of equilibrium stability and causality, and therefore can not be used for practical simulations of relativistic fluids. In this talk, I will discuss why this belief is unfounded. There is not one, but infinitely many Navier-Stokes equations because there are infinitely many conventions that can be used to define what one means by "fluid temperature", "fluid velocity" etc. out of equilibrium. The early works on relativistic hydrodynamics (Eckart, Landau-Lifshitz) have indeed adopted conventions that lead to unphysical predictions. On the other hand, when one adopts physically sensible conventions, the resulting relativistic Navier-Stokes equations are both stable and causal. Zoom link: https://osu.zoom.us/j/98849078775?pwd=WER3QlI4eFk3UUo0aGNId2h0YWhGQT09 Passcode (if required) : 693692``Zoom seminar``OSU ASC Drupal 8``ascwebservices@osu.edu``America/New_York``public`

`2020-10-21 16:15:00``2020-10-21 17:15:00``Nuclear Physics Seminar - Pavel Kovtun (University of Victoria) - Relativistic Navier-Stokes Equations``It has been widely believed that the relativistic Navier-Stokes equations violate the basic physical requirements of equilibrium stability and causality, and therefore can not be used for practical simulations of relativistic fluids. In this talk, I will discuss why this belief is unfounded. There is not one, but infinitely many Navier-Stokes equations because there are infinitely many conventions that can be used to define what one means by "fluid temperature", "fluid velocity" etc. out of equilibrium. The early works on relativistic hydrodynamics (Eckart, Landau-Lifshitz) have indeed adopted conventions that lead to unphysical predictions. On the other hand, when one adopts physically sensible conventions, the resulting relativistic Navier-Stokes equations are both stable and causal. Zoom link: https://osu.zoom.us/j/98849078775?pwd=WER3QlI4eFk3UUo0aGNId2h0YWhGQT09 Passcode (if required) : 693692``Zoom seminar``Department of Physics``physics@osu.edu``America/New_York``public`It has been widely believed that the relativistic Navier-Stokes equations violate the basic physical

requirements of equilibrium stability and causality, and therefore can not be used for practical simulations of relativistic fluids. In this talk, I will discuss why this belief is unfounded. There is not one, but infinitely many Navier-Stokes equations because there are infinitely many conventions that can be used to define what one means by "fluid temperature", "fluid velocity" etc. out of equilibrium. The early works on relativistic hydrodynamics (Eckart, Landau-Lifshitz) have indeed adopted conventions that lead to unphysical predictions. On the other hand, when one adopts physically sensible conventions, the resulting relativistic Navier-Stokes equations are both stable and causal.

Zoom link: https://osu.zoom.us/j/98849078775?pwd=WER3QlI4eFk3UUo0aGNId2h0YWhGQT09

Passcode (if required) : 693692